CloudBurst San Marcos Campus — Central Texas
Overview
TYPE3’s map data lists CloudBurst San Marcos Campus under CloudBurst Data Centers, with `Announced` status, 0 MW, and site precision at 29.76648, -97.97249. Its note says the facility is within a 75-acre site in Central Texas and was cross-referenced from DataCenterMap.com without primary-source verification. That note belongs in provenance, not as a definitive current campus boundary, because newer public development reporting describes a broader project.
CloudBurst and Evolve’s November 2025 developer announcement identifies San Marcos Data Center I in the San Marcos/New Braunfels corridor, spanning Hays and Guadalupe Counties. It describes a phased AI/HPC campus master-planned for up to 1.2 GW, with a first 50 MW phase targeted for Q4 2026, and a behind-the-meter natural-gas strategy. These are developer-level plans. They do not identify TYPE3’s DC14, DC4, DC3, DC11, or DC15 as named approved buildings or allocate their MW.
Local reporting says the Guadalupe County Commissioners Court approved a development agreement and tax-abatement agreement for CloudBurst Texas, LLC at 2955 Francis Harris Lane. This supports parent-level county development context, while Hays County and San Marcos public permit resources describe jurisdiction and search pathways. No child-specific approval, utility interconnection, TDLR, TCEQ, building schedule, critical-IT, backup, operating, or available-capacity record was located in the reviewed searches. Keep the parent linked to children without turning campus plans into child data or a current available total.
Questions
What is CloudBurst San Marcos Campus?
It is the parent record for CloudBurst’s San Marcos-area DC1–DC15 child cluster and the broader developer-announced San Marcos Data Center I project.
Does the campus have 1.2 GW available?
No. CloudBurst and Evolve describe up to 1.2 GW as a phased developer plan. It is not current available IT and is not allocated to individual child rows.
Are the numbered children approved buildings?
The reviewed evidence does not establish one-to-one mapping between DC numbers and approved buildings, phases, or separately orderable facilities. Directory topology is preserved as reported.
Sources
Nearby facilities
Browse
Saved views, watchlists, and alerting for the live grid map are on the way. Leave your email and we'll let you know the moment member access opens.
✓ You're on the list. We'll be in touch.
This state sits outside ERCOT and outside the survey. Sponsoring one funds the work of charting it — pulling its interconnection queue, large loads, and price data onto the map.
Design mockup. No wallet, exchange account, or mailing list is connected — nothing can be sent and nothing is collected.